Archive for the 'Real Estate Philosophy' Category
Can You Say, “BUSTED”??
June 23rd, 2008 category: East End LI Foreclosures, Real Estate News, Real Estate PhilosophyNo Comments »
As a Southold, New York local, it was with interest that I observed the closure of several mortgage brokers- here one day, gone the next.
Having viewed the mortgage debacle as it roared through the little area known as the North Fork, it is with great pleasure (having seen the ravaged remains of those who bought into fraudulent loan practices that were ill explained to borrowers) to see that the Feds are FINALLY demonstrating the clout that had appeared missing during the “boom” years.
Evidently, according to the following article, those consumers taken by the banks (that are now taking their homes) will get the pleasure of viewing a white collar line-up.
Do you suppose that we’ll get to see mug shots? I hope so.
photo: Lance Kidwell - stock.xchng
55+ Retirement Community? Try 70+ Wants a Home, Not a “home”
April 19th, 2008 category: Real Estate Philosophy2 Comments »
Recently, Sean and I (I’m Laurie) had back-to-back visits from our mothers, who both happen to be in their 70’s. As very different people, they bring MUCH to the ” what the he*% am I supposed to do now” dilemma facing so many pre baby boomers (pre-booms)- people in their 70’s, incredibly healthy- with most beginning the thought process in their 40’s, the future is always in the present.
Except that perhaps healthy 70-somethings have a lesson to impart.
They’re our mothers; of course this assessment is notwithstanding the ongoing-I-remember-when-I-was-six underscore- but overall, the primary objective is their own (with ours coinciding) happiness.
I should state: I am a real estate agent in NY who enjoyed success in a “55+ Community” with a builder focused on lifestyle, which resulted in a two year experience in which to engage hundreds of thinkers in this sensitive part of life.
AND, OUR MOTHERS DESCENDED, ON BACK-TO-BACK VISITS. Within a few days of one another.
Rosemary arrived, having completed an odyssey in Hawaii that culminated (after seven years) into a move of “open-mindedness”- the east coast makes sense, as the grandchildren line the east coast. With much experience in a head chef capacity, Rosemary visited a training institute with whom she’d been an active participant years earlier, with the subject being sophisticated health food (which I don’t like, but Sean does). A “thought” destination, if you will- a place of comfort, to cook and eat health food with other enthusiasts, after visits with the family. Relaxing with like-thinking enthusiasts in a bucolic setting, particularly soothing during a life change.

The result of this time of solstice (after visiting family) was to accept an offer, provided by a couple visiting this health food culinary place in the woods, for Rosemary to bring her incredible cooking expertise in order to assist this couple in their US Virgin Islands home with the benefit of her participation, all expenses and pay. Did I mention the US Virgin Islands? I guess the tropics work for her- she sounds ecstatic about the opportunity. So much for “Retirement”!
She leaves Saturday, That’s TODAY!
Judy visited in the week following Rosemary. She is in equal contemplation. Her story (she and Rosemary are very close in age) involves an inexplicable health complication that made Judy a lacrosse coach one day, and a patient experiencing seizures one day later. A few years later, to the astonishment of the medical field - Columbia Presbyterian Hospital in NYC, she is no longer a “patient”. She has returned to decision maker.
The problem with a brain issue is that just as it perplexes doctors with the magnitude of potential diagnoses, so it does to family, in the same overwhelmingly unclear way. A “HOME”, decided Judy, was best- meals provided, hospital nearby, unload the house, and calm the kids.
Except that, through the course of Judy’s recovery, all initial day-to-day minimum standards required of a person “of a certain age”, returned to her in astonishing, almost enhanced, completeness- cured.
Having been diagnosed with little clarity, her choice at the time of concern initiated a purchase relative to the situation. It’s not that situation anymore, and being one of only a few mobile individuals at “home” is disheartening for an active adult. Judy has outgrown her “retirement home”, and is seeking to return to a bit more in the way of personal choice, which for her is an environment of bike riding, walking, and shopping.
Rosemary is going to the US Virgin Islands, and at the conclusion of that adventure, we will continue to remain on her radar.
Judy will locate a house that has her current basics: access to the water, and personality. Or, a cool condo near the beach.
MANY people are seeking the condo route, and there are numerous opportunities for retirement condos on the North Fork. Our favorites include Windcrest East, Sunken Ponds, Mill Pond, Founders Village, and Silver Village, (among others).
Downsizing, as opposed to leaving yard work for others, also offers amazing opportunities on the North Fork of Long Island. There is a small home in the mid-400’s in a quiet neighborhood offering a rear second story deck overlooking woods, with little to maintenance in the front yard- small, and easy.
Sometimes, it takes looking at properties in order to make that decision.
We’d love to help.
For info on condominiums, fill out the info below for a report.
For info on downsize properties, fill out the info below for a report.
For info on both, call us between 8-8 daily, at 631-727-2227.
If you are considering selling a condo in Riverhead, we are opening a website soon: Riverheadcondos.com, showcasing only condominiums in Riverhead and Calverton. For additional info, email or call for updates on the site.
All Images Copyright 2008 Options Realty.
The MLS on the North Fork of Long Island
April 17th, 2008 category: Real Estate News, Real Estate PhilosophyNo Comments »
What is the MLS (MULTI LIST SERVICE), and what does it offer you, the seller of a home on the North Fork of Long Island?
The Multiple Listing Service of Long Island (MLSli) is a service that provides sellers with the opportunity to “share” their property with all MLSli Realtor participants. It is an elective service, meaning that real estate companies can utilize it to expand the reach of your property to all participating agents, or they can decline the service.
There are costs associated with joining the system, and brokers pay fees to join, as well as monthly fees to maintain the service. The price is small, relative to the exposure: the
MLSli, and it’s partner site, Realtor.com, have higher site visits by a large margin than any New York real estate brokerage.*
The advantage for LISTING BROKERS is that they know that they are enlisting the help of ALL Long Island Realtors, not just the group in their office, creating a huge advantage for sellers. Knowing that an important Realtor/buyer venue is part of the marketing plan can make the difference between a house that sells, and one that sits.
In addition to reaching local buyers, the MLSli reaches all Long Island buyers, and national buyers. Realtor.com is a national reach, with buyers able to access North Fork properties from anywhere in the country, with photos and details. A great combination- the local MLS and Realtor.com.
When you list your home, your listing agent will likely mention that you will be on the MLSli. You will both decide, with this exposure, what amount, out of the total fee charged by the listing company, you would like to pay a “cooperating broker”. This amount is published in the MLSli for Realtors to view.
The MLSli is often a first stop for real estate agents seeking properties for buyers, and it is possible to email listings, offer MLSli updates, and provide market updates for buyers seeking properties (yours?). For sellers, information regarding sold properties is available in order to correctly price your home relative to market conditions. Daily updates are provided to Realtors, offering them a chance to share both new and existing listings with their buying client/customer. That’s the important part, to the real estate contingent.
While some areas (NYC, the Hamptons) are fighting the inevitable by not viewing real estate as a fully cooperative effort, many sellers are demanding this service due to the huge Internet presence afforded. I’d have to agree. It’s less about “why”, and a whole lot more about “why NOT”? Until a better venue comes along, it’s got the largest reach for sellers, and current info for both Realtors and buyers.
To view MLSli properties, click on the “homes” button, and enter your parameters. To view properties listed on Realtor.com, go to www.realtor.com, and enter the area that has captured your interest.
If you have any questions, please call us at: 631-727-2227 daily, 8-8.
*per stats from Alexa rankings
image “Concert crowd”: Copyright: Milan Klusacek & iStockphoto![]()
image “apple computer”: Copyright © 2008 Apple Inc.
image “Southold Beach”: Copyright 2008 Options Realty

Buying Power on the North Fork
March 26th, 2008 category: Buyers, East End LI Foreclosures, Real Estate PhilosophyNo Comments »
Recently, we’ve received several inquiries from people interested in vacation/second/retirement homes on the North Fork of Long Island, New York.
While the majority of people are in the early stages, there is confusion- take the plunge, or wait?
Statistics are offering a clear indication that we are in a buyer-friendly market. As buyers, you control the market- a welcomed change from the days of frantic bidding wars, and disappointment.
Do buyers truly understand the power that they wield? I don’t think so- at least, not in New York.
And certainly, not on the North Fork. Here’s why:
The North Fork is a “last bastion” of seller-friendly real estate agents (one in which both agents operate on behalf of the seller, leaving the buyer unrepresented). While many are willing to go “out on a limb” in order to represent buyers with a broker agency capacity, few are willing to offer fiduciary (and the accompanying “liability”) to the current MVP- the BUYER.
Buyers have been forced to participate in the buying process in a two-on-one game- with both real estate agents representing the best interests of the seller. That this creates vicarious liability (not good) for sellers has gone unnoticed- or is simply misunderstood.
The resounding word used by local agents that eschew buyer agency is “liability”. Hmmm. Fear of a buyer suing an agent for violating the required fiduciary spelled out in a BUYER AGENCY AGREEMENT.
The question that I would pose is: WHAT IS TO FEAR? The notion that there is more to fear from the buyer (as opposed to the seller) is confounding to a company with buyer agency experience. Taking the same cautious steps and performing due diligence is what we are PAID FOR.
Anything contrary to what has been represented by a seller is something that a buyer is entitled to, irrespective of agency- inherent fairness is a requirement of representation for both parties. A buyer is also entitled, as the “boss”, to make an offer commensurate with their comfort level- and with the input of a Realtor that provides a comprehensive view of market conditions as a basis for that offer.
Buyers, until very recently, have been unable to secure a real estate representative that is “on their side“- and make no mistake- there are very defined lines.
Proponents of buyer agency are not the enemy of sellers. To the contrary, buyers with representation are better informed, and are working within parameters that are still set by the seller- they are simply represented. This commitment on the part of a buyers agent does, indeed, remove vicarious liability for the seller- liability falls to the buyers agent.
A real estate agent comfortable with the information provided to their buyer is as immune from legal ramifications as the agent representing the seller is- it’s all about providing ethical service, and achieving the “best possible price” for the buyer. Again: buyers control the market right now. If sellers want to sell, representation is moot. Offers are the name of the game.
PROSPECTIVE BUYERS OF HOMES ON THE NORTH FORK: You deserve- no- are ENTITLED to representation from a real estate agent that has the goal of your “best possible price” at the forefront. No games; no nonsense- just ethical, focused representation.
Call us to explore your buyer agency opportunity. Experienced with buyer agency, we view “liability” as a non-issue. I’d rather participate in a “fair” transaction than one in which a buyer is making an offer based on the input of real estate agents that have promised the seller the “best possible price.”
And that, folks, is what happens with every transaction that does not include buyer representation.
Before You Buy or Sell a Home on The North Fork of Long Island
March 17th, 2008 category: Buyers, Real Estate News, Real Estate Philosophy, SellersNo Comments »
Before you buy or sell a home in New York, you might want to read the article The practice of Sub-Agency is Dead. For Gosh Sakes, Let’s Bury It!
by Avery Yarbrough located here.
While we strive to provide updated market information, the above article does a better job than many others of explaining the practice of agency relationships, as presented to consumers in New York. If your listing agent is offering compensation for a “sub” agent, vicarious liability is present in the purchase. Something to think about.
Read the article Vicarious Liability
From James Kimmons here.
If you are considering a home on the North Fork of Long Island, check this out before you list your home, or purchase a home. Engaging in “dual agency” is a bad plan; better for all simply to have your real estate agent represent you, and allow the buyer’s agent to have their own representation (for whom you carry no vicarious liability).
We operate with the knowledge, having practiced Real Estate in other areas of the country, that is offered in the above article. Long Island, New York is one of only a few areas having difficulty with a transition that took place in many areas over ten years ago- don’t be behind the times!
images: Tory Byrne - stock.xchng.com
Appraisals Change on Long Island New York?
March 8th, 2008 category: East End LI Foreclosures, Real Estate News, Real Estate Philosophy6 Comments »
The following article by Patrick Rucker-ReutersUK, found here, is a good thing for consumers in New York.
“The two largest sources of U.S. mortgage financing agreed on Monday to sponsor a new home appraisal watchdog to prevent inflated home values.”
It’s rather surprising that it’s taken this long to comprehend the obvious: that appraisers connected with banks might have an ethical dilemma to self determine. Under-appraise, and impact the loan for the buyers bank (jeopardizing the purchase agreement); over-appraise, and all is well. Until market conditions change.
While the initiation of this new law in NY appears to be largely the result of those that received over appraisals in a market that seemed limitless with the respect to increases, having this law in effect in a downswing would appear to be equally beneficial to buyers and sellers of real estate in New York.
An independent appraisal in a down market will prevent overly cautious lenders from using “their own” to make judgements that will impact the price in the lenders favor. This market is subjective, and consumers don’t need banks to establish “value”- particularly if that value has, attached to it, a huge self created “sting” due to loans provided that made little sense to the consumer and are now impacting lending institutions negatively.
Separating market value and lending companies, in hindsight, seems so, well…COMMON SENSE.
For sellers today, while “declining market status” in Suffolk County, New York, will surely impact an appraisal, there is nothing “right” about assuming that a badly burned lender (and it’s fleet of connected appraisers) will not make it worse by having their own agenda present. That agenda, by the nature of the market, is likely (opinion) err on the side of caution, irrespective of the impact on sellers and buyers.
An independent appraiser, who has no future benefits with a lender via additional business, will have the ability to appraise a property without bias (or pressure in either direction). Sellers will sell at market value; buyers will buy at market value. Now, if we can just find a consistent measure of price in an inconsistent market…
Eliminating the connection of appraisers with lending institutions eliminates a major relationship that should never have existed in the first place. Good for New York.
© 2008 OptionsRealty
Photos © iStockPhoto
Buyer Agency on The North Fork of Long Island
February 1st, 2008 category: Buyers, Real Estate PhilosophyNo Comments »
BUYER AGENCY ON THE NORTH FORK OF LONG ISLAND: DON’T LEAVE HOME WITHOUT IT!
We have posted for your review a disclosure that you will be required to acknowledge when you choose to work with a real estate agent/Realtor in the state of New York.� Please see previous blog.
At Options Realty, we offer as company policy two choices:� have us represent you as a buyer, or have us represent you as a seller, or in the event of our own internal listing, on behalf of the seller. If you care for a listing that we offer, we will offer only SELLER AGENCY representation- meaning that you’d be wise to obtain your own buyer broker to look out for your best interests. Dual agency, to us, is a very bad plan, and it undermines the integrity that we’d like to see all parties exit the transaction with, including ourselves. Many local companies do not feel as we do; that choice belongs to them. We operate on our own level of integrity, not local practice.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT BUYER REPRESENTATION:
“Who pays the commission?” is a common question. Know that, if a home is presented in the MLSLI (Multi List of Long Island) the seller has indicated payment to the cooperating broker. It’s in the PRICE of the home. So- the reality is, as a buyer offering full price for a house, you pay it (from our perspective), but the listing agent compensates Options Realty OUT of the advertised fee. Offering less than full price does not negate the agreement of the seller- it simply means that they will net less due to a lower accepted offer.
“Do I have to sign a buyer agency contract in order to be represented?”- the answer is NO. The contract, if you sign it, stipulates that your will be responsible for “x” amount for the payment to your buyer agent if they locate a property that works within your parameters. At Options Realty, we choose to represent those that demonstrate a loyalty to us that matches our own loyalty to our buyer. The contract will be offered for your review; if you would prefer not to sign it, we will continue to represent you in any purchase that occurs, assuming that the relationship is working for you.
“Will I get a better price if I just call the person on the sign?” This is dangerous territory for you. What you will be relying on is that the agent on the sign, despite agreeing to represent the seller, will provide you with the “best possible price”- clearly, a HUGE CONFLICT OF INTEREST for both you and the seller. In fact, that person on the sign has likely promised the “best possible price” to the seller- it doesn’t work both ways, because it can’t. A real estate purchase is two sided: thae selling side, and the buying side. Each should have their own representation, with a promise to them alone and separately to provide the integrity needed for each to look out for the best interests of each.
“What do I do if I’ve already contacted the listing agent on the sign?” Not to worry. If you have not presented an offer that has culminated into a signed contract, simply let them know that you will be represented by a buyers agent (keep in mind their fiduciary to the seller at this point- if you encounter a problem with them, ignore it).
“What if the person on the sign tells me that they don’t offer compensation for a buyers agent?” Again, IGNORE IT. It is illegal to deny entry into a property when a buyer is represented. It is considered discriminatory to you, the buyer. While some sellers might offer “0″ to a buyers agent, payment of the fee will be presented in the offer, for the seller to decide with respect to compensation. Sellers in the MLSLI are already offering payment to cooperating brokers; it is highly unlikely that they would decline a contract based on agency representation (they are going to spend the money either way, via their listing agent).
Just as we take the notion of representing you with full fiduciary as a buyer, we also consider fiduciary a non-negotiable aspect of representing the seller. This is why, with our own listings, we encourage you to locate your own representation- and NOT within our own company. The conflict that arises here is obvious- the only way for either sellers or buyers of homes on the North Fork of Long Island to achieve fairness in the transaction, in our opinion, is to have clearly defined lines of representation.
Call us if you are seeking BUYER AGENCY on the North Fork of Long Island. It’s long overdue, and we are certain of the benefits that it will offer you. Our buyer agency is available in Riverhead, Jamesport, East Jamesport, Calverton, Baiting Hollow, Aquebogue, Mattituck, Cutchogue, Peconic, Southold, Greenport, East Marion, Orient, and Orient Point, New York.
Real Estate Agency, North Fork, Long Island
January 25th, 2008 category: Buyers, East End LI Foreclosures, Real Estate News, Real Estate Philosophy, Sellers1 Comment »
If you are thinking about selling or buying a home on the North Fork of Long Island, New York, real estate companies have a revised document for you to sign with regard to AGENCY RELATIONSHIPS.
Acknowledgement of agency laws is required by the New York Department of State in order to encourage all consumers to understand what role a Realtor will play in the way of representation to each party- the seller and the buyer. In our opinion, the bold-ed verbiage is worth note. In that way, it differs from the form that you will be signing. THIS FORM IS NOT A CONTRACT.
The following is taken directly from the New York Disclosure Form for Buyers and Sellers, and will be presented to you, with an explanation of each representation so that you are able to determine who is on your “side”, once the agency relationship has been determined. As offered by the DOS, “this disclosure will help you to make informed choices about your relationship with the real estate broker and its sales associates.”![]()
Sellers Agent: A sellers agent is an agent who is engaged by a seller to represent the seller’s interests. The seller’s agent does this by securing a buyer for the seller’s home at a price and on terms acceptable to the seller. A seller’s agent has, without limitation, the following fiduciary duties to the seller: reasonable care, undivided loyalty, confidentiality, full disclosure, obedience, and duty to account. A seller’s agent does not represent the interests of the buyer. The obligations of a seller’s agent are also subject to any specific provisions set forth in an agreement between the agent and the seller. In dealings with the buyer, a seller’s agent should a) exercise reasonable skill and care in performance of the agent’s duties; b) deal honestly, fairly, and in good faith; and c) disclose all facts known to the agent materially affecting the value or desirability of property, except as otherwise provided by law.
Buyer’s Agent: A buyer’s agent is an agent who is engaged by the buyer to represent the buyer’s interests. The buyer’s agent does this by negotiating the purchase of a home at a price and on terms acceptable to the buyer. A buyer’s agent has, without limitation, the following fiduciary duties to the buyer: reasonable care,undivided loyalty, confidentiality, full disclosure, obedience and duty to account. A buyers agent does not represent the interests of the seller. The obligations of a buyer’s agent are also subject to any specific provisions set forth in an agreement between the agent and the buyer. In dealings with the seller, a buyer’s agent should a) exercise reasonable skill and care in performance of the agent’s duties; b) deal honestly, fairly, and in good faith;and c) disclose all facts known to the agent materially affecting the buyer’s ability and/or willingness to perform a contract to acquire seller’s property that are not inconsistent with the agent’s fiduciary duties to the buyer.
Broker’s Agent: A broker’s agent is an agent that cooperates or is engaged by a listing agent or a buyers agent (but does not work for the same firm as the listing agent or buyer’s agent) to assist the listing agent or buyers agent in locating a property to sell or buy, respectively, for the listing agent’s seller or the buyer’s agent’s buyer. The broker’s agent does not have a direct relationship with the buyer or seller and the buyer or seller can not provide instructions or direction directly to the broker’s agent. The buyer and the seller therefore do not have vicarious liability for the acts of the broker’s agent. The listing agent or buyers agent do provide direction and instruction to the broker’s agent, and therefore the listing agent or buyer’s agent will have liability for the acts of the broker’s agent.
Dual Agent: A real estate agent may represent both the buyer and the seller if both the buyer and the seller give their informed consent in writing. In such a dual agency situation, the agent will not be able to provide the full range of fiduciary duties to the buyer and seller. The obligations of an agent are also subject to any specific provisions set forth in an agreement between the agent, the buyer and the seller. An agent acting as a dual agent must explain carefully both the buyer and the seller that the agent is acting for the other party as well. The agent should also explain the possible effects of dual representation, including that by consenting to the dual agency relationship the buyer and seller are giving up their right to undivided loyalty. A buyer or seller should carefully consider the possible consequences of a dual agency relationship before agreeing to such representation.
Dual Agent with Designated Sales Agents: If the buyer and seller provide their informed consent in writing, the principals or the real estate broker who represents both parties as a dual agent may designate a sales agent to represent the buyer and another sales agent to represent the seller to negotiate the purchase and sale of real estate. A sales agent works under the supervision of the real estate broker. With the informed consent of the buyer and the seller in writing, the designated sales agent for the buyer will function as the buyer’s agent representing the interests of and advocating on behalf of the buyer and the designated sales agent and the designated sales agent for the seller will function as the seller’s agent representing the interests of and advocating on behalf of the seller in negotiations between the buyer and the seller. A designated sales agent range of fiduciary cannot provide the full duties to the buyer or seller. The designated sales agent must explain that like the dual agent under whose supervision they function, they cannot provide undivided loyalty. A buyer or seller should carefully consider the possible consequences of a dual agency relationship with designated sales agents before agreeing to such representation.
(emphasis added)
For sellers, the other consideration when reviewing agency is to make a determination as to which agency, if any, you will offer compensation, particularly if your Realtor is promoting your property on the Multi List system of Long Island (MLSLI, with the feeder to Realtor.com). Realtors utilize this system to provide exposure for your property, and your compensation is advertised to the Realtor community with the following designations defined above:
SA, or seller’s agent
BA, or buyer’s agent
Broker’s Agent
For sellers, understanding the advantages/ramifications of each agency compensated is imperative. Establish what is best for you by discussing this with a few Realtors to gain as much comprehension as possible. Full understanding on your part of each designation is the responsibility of the Realtor who lists your home, sells your home, or facilitates the purchase of a new home- clarity on the part of the Realtor involved will facilitate an easier transition for both sellers and the buyers that purchase your home. KEYWORD: FIDUCIARY.
Call us if you’d like to have a conversation about Agency relationships. While we offer opinions on all things real estate, this is a serious consideration for consumers- too much information isn’t enough.
If I Were Selling or Buying a Home on the North Fork of Long Island
January 21st, 2008 category: Buyers, East End LI Foreclosures, Real Estate Philosophy, Sellers1 Comment »
If I were a seller on the North Fork of Long Island, New York, I would ask the following question of the Realtor offering their services: Do you understand fiduciary?
What is fiduciary, from a seller perspective? Here are some good questions:
1. Will my property be entered into the MLSLI immediately? I want all agents with buyers to know that it’s for sale; that will potentially increase the offer that is made to me.
2. Are you seeking the best offer for ME, or are you interested in excluding Realtors that may have a good offer, but will take half of the fee that I’ve offered you to sell the property, preventing you and your company from getting it ALL? I don’t want an agent or company that’s not complying with fiduciary here; what you and your company receive is what I’ve agreed to, and I don’t care who it goes to. Nor should you, if you understand your fiduciary to me.
3. Will your sign out front be welcoming to all that might have an interest, without that antiquated “exclusive” part attached to it? I don’t want to discourage anyone from seeing my house. What’s up with the “exclusive” on my sign?
4. Will you provide me with ALL binders, so that I can make the decision? I think that I deserve that- after all, I’m paying your fee. Can I trust you with this?
If I were buying a home on the North Fork of Long Island, I would demand a buyer agent. Buyers agents operate with fiduciary- that’s what the Realtor code of ethics requires.
If I want a home, the “fee” for the buyers agent is already in the price. Hey, I’m not stupid. And no, I don’t want to be a “customer” of the listing agent or anything else- my agenda is to locate the best value, and that means my own Buyers Agent. Period. If I want to make a low-ball offer through the listing company, that’s my right, too- respect that I do NOT want to buy through the selling company, but they can facilitate a low-ball. Anything else and I’m compromising my own money.
AND, I want to see ALL of the available homes. I’ve given a price range, and I want to see them all. If my buyers agent wants to show a home that I may have to “pay” him or her for, no thanks- I’d take it off of the offer price, anyway- we all KNOW that sellers have included some kind of payment if you offer it to agents that only represent sellers- “SUB-AGENTS”. What are those types of agents still doing around, anyway? If you can pay a sub-agent, you have made financial room for a buyers agent- they often have buyers. I want their offers.
What? You’ve counseled your seller to pay less to a buyers agent, or nothing to a buyers agent? Hmm. I wonder what’s wrong with the house- is there a problem that a buyers agent will uncover?
Oh- and if you want to make it difficult, so what. The market is declining anyway. Hey, I want to buy a house. You can make it easier, or I’ll just wait.
Really, it’s all so simple, this FIDUCIARY stuff. And well worth understanding.
Make sure that your Realtor “gets it”- after all, it’s required.
At Options Realty, we “get it”, whether you are selling or buying a home. Your interests come first.
TO SELLERS OF HOMES ON THE NORTH FORK…
January 15th, 2008 category: Buyers, Real Estate Philosophy, SellersNo Comments »
AN EAST END OF THE NORTH FORK, LONG ISLAND NEW YORK REAL ESTATE PHENOMENON
We’ve been noticing a very interesting pattern with respect to sellers and their understanding of buyer agency. The pattern appears to convey a lack of understanding.
When you list your home for sale, one of several things may occur. This segment deals with the real estate agent that shows your home, representing the BUYER, not you, the SELLER.
The MLSLI service on Long Island shows the commission being paid by the seller to potential real estate agents with buyers. With alarming frequency, there is a “O” or reduced amount offered in the MLSLI to the agents that represent buyers. By reduced, I don’t mean that it’s “too low”. What is seen is an amount paid to a real estate agent that brings a buyer, but agrees to REPRESENT THE SELLER- this amount- is often higher than the amount offered to the agent that provides a buyer, but REPRESENTS THE BUYER. In too many cases, the amount paid is “0″.
The MLSLI, and REALTOR.COM, is viewed nationally, both by real estate agents and consumers. This is a huge tool in selling your home.
In a typical buyer agency agreement, the buyer has an understanding that is COMMON PRACTICE: the costs to sell the home are reflected when pricing the home by the seller. All sellers build in the amount of payment to the real estate contingent (as well as other potential costs) that are involved in the sale- there is no secret here. If a seller has priced the home to include real estate agents that represent the seller only, the SAME DOLLAR AMOUNT IS TYPICALLY PAID out of the seller’s pocket.
Think you’ll get offered less, when a buyer is represented by a real estate agent? THINK AGAIN. If a home is priced correctly, based on market conditions, the fiduciary required on the part of a buyers agent is not compromised by offering fair market value, for a home that buyers really want. To the contrary; despite possible haggling, the end result is often no different than dealing with a real estate agent that “represents” you, the seller. BOTTOM LINE: getting the house sold should be at the top of the agenda for your listing agent, which would include ALL avenues of marketing exposure and reach.
With much of the buying agenda focused on home BUYERS (the investors aren’t the majority anymore), the game has changed.
Buyers Agency has been in place in most parts of the country for 15 YEARS or more. While initially balked at (the reaction was “why should I, as a seller, pay for the buyer to be represented”) it became clear that in most cases, good market or bad, buyer agency better protects both the buyer AND the seller.
SHOULD BUYERS HAVE TO PAY THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS? They do- it’s in the price of the home.
PRICING COMPROMISES OCCUR IN A SLOW MARKET. IT DOESN’T MATTER WHETHER THE BUYER IS REPRESENTED BY BUYER AGENCY. AS A SELLER, YOU CONTROL THE “SOLD” PRICE. Your listing agent should be competent enough to handle all offers, regardless of the source. The key is to GET OFFERS.
Consider this: if an agent (other than your listing agent ) shows your home (representing you, the seller) and makes an error in some form, YOU, as the seller, are accepting this representation (despite not having chosen the cooperating broker ). You, as a seller, already have representation, via your listing agent, and typically, your attorney. It became evident, in most parts of the country, that sellers didn’t need the potential liability of two representatives; buyers, on the other hand, needed representation.
Additionally, buyers KNOW that the fees are included in the price of the home. Just ask anyone doing a FSBO- often, lookers expect the absent fees to be deducted, when calculating an offer.
If your real estate agent insists on representation from the cooperating broker for YOU, the SELLER, what does that say about their own competence? Frankly, I’d prefer to have a buyers agent in the equation- and counsel all sellers to include the contingent that is currently controlling the market. As a listing agent, our preference is to represent only you, and not subject you to potential errors from an agent representing you (but working with your buyer).
THINK HARD ABOUT ELIMINATING BUYERS AGENCY. THINK HARD ABOUT ANY REAL ESTATE AGENT, WITH FIDUCIARY TO YOU, THE SELLER, WHO COUNSELS AN ACTION THAT ELIMINATES BUYERS IN A MARKET BEGGING FOR BUYERS.
IN OUR OPINION, IT’S A BREACH OF FIDUCIARY TO YOU, THE SELLER, TO COMPROMISE ANY BUYER THAT MIGHT WANT YOUR HOME.
WE OFFER OPINIONS OF REAL ESTATE PRACTICES ON THE NORTH FORK THAT IMPACT SELLERS AND BUYERS.
We’d love to hear your opinions on the practice of “eliminating” some members of the home buying community by eliminating their representation. Has your listing agent explained ALL of this to you, the SELLER?
If you don’t offer compensation to buyer representation, the home can be shown- but will it be purchased in an uncomfortable (and unnecessary) circumstance? Perhaps…perhaps not.
If you have authorized your real estate agent to exclude buyers, rethink it.
Just welcome buyers and their representation in, and see what happens. Remember, YOU control the accepted offer.
IT IS OUR OPINION THAT ELIMINATING BUYERS IS A VERY POOR CHOICE. We don’t want our sellers missing out on buyers, period. Buyer agency offers fairness to all, and less liability for you, the seller. Just our opinion, based on experience.
« Previous Entries Next Entries »| |
Ask The Broker
Categories
- Buyers (62)
- Downtown Riverhead (8)
- East End LI Foreclosures (49)
- North Fork Neighborhoods (25)
- Over 55 / Active Adult (3)
- People and Places (40)
- Real Estate News (195)
- Real Estate Philosophy (46)
- Riverhead Real Estate (16)
- Sellers (38)
- Southold Real Estate (26)
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
Blogroll
- Real Estate Tomato
- Blood Hound Realty
- Understanding Real Estate Fees
- Fifty Five and…BETTER! A Lifestyle Change
- Indy Real Estate Talk
- Real Estate Blogs
- New York Foreclosure Law Blog
- Long Island Business News
- The Real Deal Blog
- The Blog That Ate Miami
- The Vest Pocket
- East End Buzz
- 24/7 REO Realty
Links
- Foreclosure Lawyers, Macco & Stern
- Realtor.com
- Multiple Listing Service of Long Island
- State Foreclosure Laws
- Fannie Mae Foreclosure
- Real Estate Blogs
- Raleigh Cary Realty
- Stage to Sell
- ZIPskinny
- HUD in New York




