North Fork, Long Island, NY Real Estate Blog OptionsRealty.com » Blog Archive

Buying Power on the North Fork

March 26th, 2008 category: Buyers, East End LI Foreclosures, Real Estate Philosophy

Options Realty Red Man Recently, we’ve received several inquiries from people interested in vacation/second/retirement homes on the North Fork of Long Island, New York.

While the majority of people are in the early stages, there is confusion- take the plunge, or wait?

Statistics are offering a clear indication that we are in a buyer-friendly market. As buyers, you control the market- a welcomed change from the days of frantic bidding wars, and disappointment.

Do buyers truly understand the power that they wield? I don’t think so- at least, not in New York.

And certainly, not on the North Fork. Here’s why:

The North Fork is a “last bastion” of seller-friendly real estate agents (one in which both agents operate on behalf of the seller, leaving the buyer unrepresented). While many are willing to go “out on a limb” in order to represent buyers with a broker agency capacity, few are willing to offer fiduciary (and the accompanying “liability”) to the current MVP- the BUYER. Quote 1

Buyers have been forced to participate in the buying process in a two-on-one game- with both real estate agents representing the best interests of the seller. That this creates vicarious liability (not good) for sellers has gone unnoticed- or is simply misunderstood.

The resounding word used by local agents that eschew buyer agency is “liability”. Hmmm. Fear of a buyer suing an agent for violating the required fiduciary spelled out in a BUYER AGENCY AGREEMENT.

The question that I would pose is: WHAT IS TO FEAR? The notion that there is more to fear from the buyer (as opposed to the seller) is confounding to a company with buyer agency experience. Taking the same cautious steps and performing due diligence is what we are PAID FOR.

Anything contrary to what has been represented by a seller is something that a buyer is entitled to, irrespective of agency- inherent fairness is a requirement of representation for both parties. A buyer is also entitled, as the “boss”, to make an offer commensurate with their comfort level- and with the input of a Realtor that provides a comprehensive view of market conditions as a basis for that offer.

Options Realty Buyer Bridge Buyers, until very recently, have been unable to secure a real estate representative that is “on their side“- and make no mistake- there are very defined lines.

Proponents of buyer agency are not the enemy of sellers. To the contrary, buyers with representation are better informed, and are working within parameters that are still set by the seller- they are simply represented. This commitment on the part of a buyers agent does, indeed, remove vicarious liability for the seller- liability falls to the buyers agent.

A real estate agent comfortable with the information provided to their buyer is as immune from legal ramifications as the agent representing the seller is- it’s all about providing ethical service, and achieving the “best possible price” for the buyer. Again: buyers control the market right now. If sellers want to sell, representation is moot. Offers are the name of the game.

Quote 2 PROSPECTIVE BUYERS OF HOMES ON THE NORTH FORK: You deserve- no- are ENTITLED to representation from a real estate agent that has the goal of your “best possible price” at the forefront. No games; no nonsense- just ethical, focused representation.

Call us to explore your buyer agency opportunity. Experienced with buyer agency, we view “liability” as a non-issue. I’d rather participate in a “fair” transaction than one in which a buyer is making an offer based on the input of real estate agents that have promised the seller the “best possible price.”

And that, folks, is what happens with every transaction that does not include buyer representation.